Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Keen.com
Shaman kiri
flora0250:
No I didn’t chat with her. I selected the chat to chat with her and she was suddenly unavailable both times. So I sent her a message saying hey I read with you before briefly and would like to try again. I was actually prepared to try a longer reading if I felt she was giving me info that made me feel she was tuned in. Anyway I said that I read her profile so that she would know I wasn’t just blindly contacting her again without doing so. She replied off the bat that she didn’t give free minutes only if it was a first time chat or if it was someone who left feedback.
And that’s how our whole interaction happened. I didn’t spend another cent on her because she then immediately said well you only gave me five minutes before so you must not have liked the reading and so I guess we don’t connect.
So that’s how that happened.
HornetKick:
--- Quote from: icloud9 on December 28, 2018, 11:36:26 AM ---What I don't understand is, why would you argue with her using your own funds during chat? Isn't that a loss on your end. I know you said she didnt work for you the first time, but you went and got another 5 minute reading? And when you ended the chat, she emailed you asking if you were disappointed? and then you called her a cold reader? I don't understand this interaction. You could have just asked for a refund.
I can certainly understand the frustration if the reading lacked details. I just wouldn't have gone for a second reading and wasted more funds if the first time you didn't feel connected. I've gone to advisors with glowing feedback but had less-than-average readings. Me? I just move on. I don't dwell on bad readings, and I don't go back to those advisors. So I had a call with Cookie earlier. I was left with no NEW insight or information after the call. She kept repeating the lines of "i see many new beginnings for you. more money coming for you. lots of joy and happiness. Your health comes up". NO details, NO specifics, NO useful insight. ISN'T THAT A COLD READING?
So, although I am a SK fan, I can def relate to how flora feels if this ( the way I feel about Cookie's reading ) is the same way she felt about her reading with Kira. Except I spent 20 minutes to give her a chance, not 5... At the end tho, what did I get out of that reading? Nothing! Nothing from her general read that was detailed, and I was trying to also ask her specific questions. She didn't connect to those, either. She also didn't even connect to the issue SHE previously had told me would happen (and it did). And she completely disregarded and said she doesnt see that happening (although it IS happening - health issue) but something else is coming (WTF is this now!?). Anyway, not trying to bombard this thread on Kira with my experience with another advisor.. but I guess my point is....
IF Kira is a cold reader, then COOKIE IS A COLD READER. (BTW guys. I KNOW cookie is gifted. Many people praise her. But this was my second reading with her and I got absolutely nothing out of it. Nothing!!! Highly disappointed after this experience. So she may be gifted, but she clearly can't connect EVERY time. See, just an example of how every experience is different) - jeeze, I should have probably posted this under cookie's thread lol
In my own personal experience, SK is the farthest from a cold reader. She's been way too detailed in specifics (the details you can't just guess) for me and been spot on with certain predictions - the ups and downs. she's not perfect by any means, but she's in my top 3 alongside other top solid advisors on KEEN. The way people praise aries intuition on this forum, that's pretty much how I feel about SK.
--- End quote ---
I totally agree with you about Cookie and I've had just as many readings with her as you have and she said basically the same kind of mundane speech that she gave you. I never drank the Cookie tea though so I guess I'll never feel the way others have about her. You make me want to try this SK chick. I'll have to think about it.
HornetKick:
--- Quote from: flora0250 on December 28, 2018, 02:23:03 AM ---I also 100% believe now that either she reads this board, that keen psychics in general do, or that people in some way associated with trying to promote the company do - as well as provide phony posts about recommendations of readers to try to increase their business I am really convinced of this.
Good luck to all - I do not recommend this reader. Not because “we didn’t have a connection” or I’m cynical or not open - but because I really do believe she is someone to be extremely wary of to say the least.
Also, don’t trust everyone’s reviews on here. Even those that appear to be around a long time.
--- End quote ---
Yes we have gotten a lot of that lately, but what about your last comment? Are you saying readers have been on the board a long time?
flora0250:
--- Quote from: HornetKick on December 28, 2018, 03:34:19 PM ---
--- Quote from: flora0250 on December 28, 2018, 02:23:03 AM ---I also 100% believe now that either she reads this board, that keen psychics in general do, or that people in some way associated with trying to promote the company do - as well as provide phony posts about recommendations of readers to try to increase their business I am really convinced of this.
Good luck to all - I do not recommend this reader. Not because “we didn’t have a connection” or I’m cynical or not open - but because I really do believe she is someone to be extremely wary of to say the least.
Also, don’t trust everyone’s reviews on here. Even those that appear to be around a long time.
--- End quote ---
Yes we have gotten a lot of that lately, but what about your last comment? Are you saying readers have been on the board a long time?
--- End quote ---
What I meant by my comments were that even those accounts that have been posting a long time doesn’t mean they may not be in some way connected where they would have the profit of a particular reader as motivation for some posts over truth.
I’m just really struggling with how so many people can report that not one single prediction has come to pass while others are very adamant that so and so has given an accurate prediction about something. I just don’t get it. And if you know the saying the simplest explanation is usually the right one? The simplest explanation in my opinion - which is just that!! Take it or leave it! - is that the only way it makes sense is if some portion are in some way not truthful about their experiences so that they can help that particular reader profit - OR maybe a lot of readers are just very good cold readers which anyone - but especially people that are emotional - are vulnerable to (myself included). People can give away a lot of information just by asking a question like “what does so and so feel about me?”
Sorry not trying to make this long winded. I’m trying to say that I am very wary of believing everything everyone posts about praising readers and predictions coming true. It would be too easy for people who are really motivated by profit to come here create accounts and post about a particular reader to help their profit. That to me is the most simple and logical explanation as to why many people say no predictions have come to pass while others sing praises of certain readers. And this is regardless of whether the person posting has a long history of posting or not is what I meant by the last comment.
I’m ready for everyone to call me cynical and skeptical and crazy and paranoid now and a conspiracy theorist lol. Fire away lol. But that’s what I honestly think. But I am still calling readers because the thought of that still blows my mind. I still have a hard time understanding and explaining it. It doesn’t make sense to me. I still am tempted by that desire to find someone who is reliable with predictions. Not even a prediction I want or don’t want. Just a true prediction. That I know wasn’t just a lucky guess - which could also be the explanation for those that have predictions happen.
Just my thoughts. Hope that clarifies. Like I said I’m ready for the slings and arrows lol. But won’t relly to personal attacks should they come from what I’ve stated.
ShootingStar:
--- Quote from: Penelope on December 27, 2018, 09:10:14 AM ---I thought I’d give her another try and I am not sure what to make of the second reading. She said “I am questioning if this man is on a sociopath level”. She felt “ZERO” empathy from him. I first read with her in September. At that time, I had to pull back and walk away. My POI was mad so her reading indicated that he’s moved in a different direction. The thing is, my POI could never fully let go, but he won’t step up, so I had to be the one to pull away. He’s been “lurking” so I wanted to get an update on him. Her description of him having no empathy was both absurd and true. My POI admitted that he can’t emphasize with others. He doesn’t know how. But at the same time, he also admitted strong emotional attachments and care for certain people in his life. So, she picked up on one aspect of his personality and said that he’ll never change. I am left feeling that her reading only captured a small part of the big picture. I felt she was able to pick up on specific points and based conclusions off that. I am not saying she is wrong. I am just don’t feel as though she connected with all the other parts. Or if she did, she didn’t think they were relevant.
--- End quote ---
I am in no way a psychologist and I don’t know your POI at all, I am merely throwing out a thought to see if it’s a possibility. My dad is a narcissist, is actually quite emotional and seemingly had attachments to people...it takes a long time to realize that that his attachments and the way he loves others is different than other peoples. He seems like he is such a softy but he’s a very complex person. It all had to do with himself and not actually the other person, like we might truly love another person and be attached them them...narcissists versions of those have very different roots. I’m terrible at explaining but could be something to look into? I could also be completely off base!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version