This goes not only for Diane but for anyone else, I appreciate reading BALANCED and truthful feedback and not distortions - a distortion is provided, when information is given that is not 100% balanced - the accurate and not accurate... As I've followed Baypark's situation (leaving it to her personally to disclose or not - not my call), I don't feel its fully balanced.
I understand this, but I disagree with you. I think she's giving us some very honest and helpful feedback. I don't need to know every time a reader was accurate about something, if they turn out to be wrong on the bigger picture.
I tend to agree with Still Tired here.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions, feelings and expectation
s of a reading. Some of us might be super impressed by a contact prediction that comes through; others may only be looking for the bigger picture and outcomes -- stuff they consider important. It's understanda
ble that Baypark is disappointe
d with the turn of events and not seeing that coming...
Also, I think we're all smart enough to read the threads and decide what information is important for us. I personally would still read with Diane... I had one reading and liked her (outcome pending), but I appreciate knowing what happened with Baypark and I can also empathize with her frustration and disappointm
ent without seeing it as 'bashing.' In other words, it's clear (and understanda
ble) that she's not feeling great now about those readings... but I don't extrapolate from her experience that Diane is no good for anyone.