Relationship Psychology Discussions > The Vent

Oh the lurkers....

<< < (7/9) > >>

Love2lovenj:

--- Quote from: miss_t on May 24, 2019, 03:23:33 PM ---I was a lurker until today. Almost everyday I keep trying to login but I keep getting that message about waiting for admin approval. Why does it have to take that long? Anyhoo, was just approved today so here I am. Just posted about Angel Readings (bitwine) and Clarissa (AskNow). Will be posting on other readers as well. Still thinking who is worth the time lol

--- End quote ---

Well welcome aboard miss t.  👍  Looking forward to reading your opinions on your bitwine readers.  I say strictly them because its too easy to want to try new ppl on other platforms.  Need to keep some money in my wallet. Lol

Love2lovenj:

--- Quote from: naturegirl on May 24, 2019, 05:08:51 AM ---I was a long-time lurker while addicted to Bitwine to read reviews, but that was when there were just a couple of bitwine threads that weren't specific to any one reader. I joined so that I could share my experiences and pay it forward essentially, but I've been hesitant to lay it all out there right away because prior to joining I saw a lot of newbies being accused of being shills so I want to earn a little trust before I post my list. I do chime in when I see someone getting ready to use someone I know is not legit that hasn't been called out for that by anyone or if someone asks and there aren't many responses. I plan to just go through my history and make a list of everyone I read with and rate them on some type of scale I think because there are so many and I don't have time to say too much about each of them. I was thinking I might try to describe them each in like 3 words and give them a number lol. I promise you there are many advisors that lurk though because I've had a few mention it. Before I joined all I did was google the advisor name and read the threads that came up in the search. There were many posters that I recognized as bitwine users because they used the same user name or a variation of that name or I even matched up some people that used different names based on the date of their post saying "I just read with so and so blah blah blah" and there would be a coinciding review for that advisor that date that either said something similar or had the same writing style. I'd "assume" it was that person who posted, but then three weeks later (or whatever) when they posted they'd just read with a different advisor and yup a review for THAT advisor was left by the same user as the other one.... You get the picture. I could tell you Josh's bitwine user name. I won't because I think it's probably his real name and some of you have maybe drawn similar conclusions about people, but my point is that we're not dummies and neither are they. They can figure out who we are if we provide cross-referenceable info. I think it might be harder for them now to make connections like that now that there are individual threads, but who knows? I never understood the hate for that justkindle psychic that posted here. I thought her posts were informative and she didn't give away info that can't be found by literally anyone who knows how to use Google. The info people post here is not private, none of it. Matter of fact, when I make my list I'm going to put an X in every advisor name I type (or something) so that the thread won't pop up when the reader googles their name. They'll actually have to come to the forum and read through all the posts. Maybe I'll put it in the vent section so it doesn't come up if they search bitwine. We make it too easy for them, but I was thankful for that when I wasn't a member. I do appreciate all the reviews and I wish I had found the site sooner because I could have saved myself a lot of money and avoided believing a lot of things that were never going to happen or were never felt by another person or whatever. Plus you guys are funny and insightful. Definitely not batshit. Thank you, non-lurkers!

--- End quote ---

Great post nature!  I honestly don't care if a reader sees a review. Maybe it will validate for them that we do appreciate those who genuinely use their gift and make the frauds realize that we will out them.   

I think my concern about the readers being on here is that some make it too easy for the scammers if they give to much details about the situation.   We have to be extremely careful if we say something that is too specific that when you call in they can use.  Never understood why someone would use the same user name here as on the site they read on just for this very reason.  Its really ashame that we even have to worry about things like that.

Love2lovenj:

--- Quote from: candiednut on May 24, 2019, 12:05:15 AM ---I dont care if people "lurk" - what I DO mind is when lurkers make it hard to reach psychics since they all jump in the queue after someone posts about a psychic, and then they DONT POST their experience with said psychic. The person that recommended the psychic took their time to share their experience so that other people can have the opportunity to read, which makes it harder for EVERYONE to read with said psychic. Can't lurkers at least contribute to reviewing the psychics they've read with as a result of following someone else's recommendation??

--- End quote ---

You are so right!! Then you look at the threads and their are no updates on people's experiences.  Its like wth, it's taken weeks to read with this person but apparently its not because of anyone here because no one has posted anything. Smh

Love2lovenj:

--- Quote from: jas on May 23, 2019, 01:51:56 PM ---Can I ask what prompted this thread?  Did a lurker upset everyone on another thread?

--- End quote ---

What prompted this thread is the frustration that it seems only a handful contribute to the threads yet there is a crap load of views.  To me it would seem if advisor xxxx has only 2 comments  and yet 300 views there has got to be at least a few more people who has tried them.  So please chime in to let others know how you felt about the reading.  Like i said it doesn't have to be extremely detailed but maybe what you liked or didn't like about it.  Was the reader slow, did they go off topic, was it pulling teeth to get any info, was the person rude.  Maybe give their style of reading is everything short answer, are they detailed? Some people want to know if the person is a constant clock watcher.  If you email them do they get back to you? You know anything that may help someone else decided whether or not they are worth the try or just not what they advertise to be.

Sparkle002:

--- Quote from: Love2lovenj on May 25, 2019, 10:36:01 AM ---
--- Quote from: candiednut on May 24, 2019, 12:05:15 AM ---I dont care if people "lurk" - what I DO mind is when lurkers make it hard to reach psychics since they all jump in the queue after someone posts about a psychic, and then they DONT POST their experience with said psychic. The person that recommended the psychic took their time to share their experience so that other people can have the opportunity to read, which makes it harder for EVERYONE to read with said psychic. Can't lurkers at least contribute to reviewing the psychics they've read with as a result of following someone else's recommendation??

--- End quote ---

You are so right!! Then you look at the threads and their are no updates on people's experiences.  Its like wth, it's taken weeks to read with this person but apparently its not because of anyone here because no one has posted anything. Smh

--- End quote ---

Omg this happens with Cookie’s thread (Keen). Like I never see anyone come back and update what came true or not...just how long they have been in her queue

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version