Well, I never go through all the trouble of ‘considering the source’ when feedback is left. I take it for what it is and how that person possibly felt at the time. But in saying that I also look at the kind of feedback left. I completely disagree when readers are rated a 1 or 2 star for technical issues (as if it were their fault). And although I’m not that familiar with LadyP (a short read some time ago), I do know some readers are snarky and have issues just like everybody else. Sometimes when they say they don’t know, just means they can’t interpret. I do get there are some things they aren’t suppose to know, but act like they do and just say anything.
I just found the review interesting and the fact it was so recent. I spent $20 bucks on a 5 min call to her in March and she gave no direction, nor help actually. I asked about a business I started and a civil case I was involved with and nothing she said pointed me N,S,E or W. I guess I could give her another shot, but I generally disregard emphatic readers (only reading with her due to this forum), unless they have definitive concrete C’s backing their emphatic-ness (Clairvoyanc e, Clairsentie nce, Clairaudien ce).
