The thing is, is a reader good just because they're telling you bad news? I think doom and gloom readers are just as bad as sugarcoater readers. Why? Because anyone can say, "he can't commit", "you're too good for him", "he won't change". Also, if they're using opinion on your situation and telling multiple people the same thing, then they're not giving genuine info. It's recycling readings. If I'm being given bad news, I can accept it but want validated evidence. I want a little more than, "yeah. He has A, B & C issues". Yeah, I get it (that's why I'm calling. He must have SOME issue), but I want you to back up why you're getting that info. I want to know more, so I know you're just not recycling the reading. Just like if a reader gives you good news, you want evidence of validating, otherwise you'll think they're a fairy reader. So far, all of the readings that have been negative have been just as bad as positive ones. The same guesswork and barnum. If a reader can break you bad news, but give you deep rooted reasons like "This happened with his ex partner", or "in his childhood, I sense that so and so happened" and go into detail, then that's a backed up reading and something you know that isn't easy to guess.
I've only had 2 negative readings so far and they've both been readers who are doom and gloom or don't like being positive about relationships..