The Psychic Reviews
Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions => CaliforniaPsychics.com => Topic started by: whimerj on December 18, 2025, 05:01:25 PM
-
I was thinking the first thing she says at the start of the call is often the important part. I remember she had told me one time its better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all, and she ended up being right. Im curious if anyone can corroborate? I feel she is told something at the beginning and ends up being correct and then the more you talk she may mix energies and assume the next person she gets in the reading is the same person. I am quite curious about her first statement and the accuracy of it.
-
I was thinking the first thing she says at the start of the call is often the important part. I remember she had told me one time its better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all, and she ended up being right. Im curious if anyone can corroborate? I feel she is told something at the beginning and ends up being correct and then the more you talk she may mix energies and assume the next person she gets in the reading is the same person. I am quite curious about her first statement and the accuracy of it.
Yeah so, my comment has nothing to do with Mattie. I've never read with her before. But that quote, I fkn hate it. It's much better to have never loved at all than to lose love because if you never loved at all, then you never suffer the crushing pain that can take years to get over from losing that love. I'd much rather take a hard pass on the love shit in order to avoid the pain because the pain lasts much longer than the love. Just because it's quote, doesn't make it accurate or meaningful for everyone. And I personally hate it and completely disagree with it. Just call me bitter lol.