that person has better luck than me. my reading nowadays with her is usually the first or the first two sentences. then she starts filling in stuff not seen in the cards. Every time I ask her, there is a third party. the funny thing is, none of the third party exists. NOT even a single one. I would think there has to be one time she is right but she has not been.
there is one time I know my ex is seeing someone (4 months after we broke up he met someone new). I asked her and she said "how do you know he is seeing someone? from facebook?"
so now I usually move onto my second question without letting her filling in on my first question because I know it is usually the opposite of what is happening or will happen. literally OPPOSITE.
Modify message
quote author=Rayban212 link=topic=957.msg114483#msg114483 date=1587347149]
she is good with yes/no question. she is also good with when you ll start a new romantic relationship. she is also good with whether this relationship will be a long-term or short term sort of thing. But she never worked for me when she mentions that she sees someone else around this person. in my case, there was never such a person around the guy, at least at that time. She was always dead wrong when she mention this in my reading. and she almost mentions this every time I asked her about an ex so I stopped asking her.
she used to be so so accurate. but now, the first thing she mentions in my reading is accurate and the subsequent sentences are usually wrong. so I just listen to her first sentence.
for example, she said and said often "you are not going to get back together. But you will be friends and close friends." we never got back together. true. but we lost contact immediately after we broke up. so what friends? she said "his attention is focused elsewhere. he is seeing someone." first sentence true, but he was not seeing anyone at the time. I don't like it when she tells me stuff she does not see in the card to fill up the content.
so first sentence. any elaboration from her is wrong for me. don't know what happened? she started this nonsense since 2012-2013.
That's funny you say that because someone else on this board mentioned this as well but they said its really the first 2-3 minutes were she accurately picks up stuff. They also stated the rest of the reading is usually her input and not to listen. interesting.....
[/quote]