Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > CaliforniaPsychics.com
Mattie
whimerj:
I was thinking the first thing she says at the start of the call is often the important part. I remember she had told me one time its better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all, and she ended up being right. Im curious if anyone can corroborate? I feel she is told something at the beginning and ends up being correct and then the more you talk she may mix energies and assume the next person she gets in the reading is the same person. I am quite curious about her first statement and the accuracy of it.
Miss Philosopher:
--- Quote from: whimerj on December 18, 2025, 05:01:25 PM ---I was thinking the first thing she says at the start of the call is often the important part. I remember she had told me one time its better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all, and she ended up being right. Im curious if anyone can corroborate? I feel she is told something at the beginning and ends up being correct and then the more you talk she may mix energies and assume the next person she gets in the reading is the same person. I am quite curious about her first statement and the accuracy of it.
--- End quote ---
Yeah so, my comment has nothing to do with Mattie. I've never read with her before. But that quote, I fkn hate it. It's much better to have never loved at all than to lose love because if you never loved at all, then you never suffer the crushing pain that can take years to get over from losing that love. I'd much rather take a hard pass on the love shit in order to avoid the pain because the pain lasts much longer than the love. Just because it's quote, doesn't make it accurate or meaningful for everyone. And I personally hate it and completely disagree with it. Just call me bitter lol.
whimerj:
--- Quote from: Miss Philosopher on December 18, 2025, 08:50:28 PM ---
--- Quote from: whimerj on December 18, 2025, 05:01:25 PM ---I was thinking the first thing she says at the start of the call is often the important part. I remember she had told me one time its better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all, and she ended up being right. Im curious if anyone can corroborate? I feel she is told something at the beginning and ends up being correct and then the more you talk she may mix energies and assume the next person she gets in the reading is the same person. I am quite curious about her first statement and the accuracy of it.
--- End quote ---
Yeah so, my comment has nothing to do with Mattie. I've never read with her before. But that quote, I fkn hate it. It's much better to have never loved at all than to lose love because if you never loved at all, then you never suffer the crushing pain that can take years to get over from losing that love. I'd much rather take a hard pass on the love shit in order to avoid the pain because the pain lasts much longer than the love. Just because it's quote, doesn't make it accurate or meaningful for everyone. And I personally hate it and completely disagree with it. Just call me bitter lol.
--- End quote ---
Yea I think its just a saying she says. I think I read one time that she opened a call with congratulating someone and they ended up getting that relationship. I think maybe she gets the right thing in the beginning say she says it wont work and then people ask questions and she continues the reading and she says there will be progression because spirit are showing her something evolving with a new person.
flora0250:
It’s so frustrating to see all the reviews of hers deleted. Unless I’m missing something. I read with her recently again and against my better judgement. I believe more and more she is a cold reader and the things she got right in the past for me were either coincidence or based on probability of what what I fed her. I tried to be open minded but she again is feeding me the same reading that it won’t work out with this guy but you’ve got a new guy coming around the corner. Which is what she told me last time.
And I thought honestly that this latest interest was the guy she predicted coming around the corner as my happily ever after. So I give up with her. Because she has also gotten wrong in the past years ago telling me for sure I would reconnect with someone I never did. And what I mentioned before with her (and is true for any reader) is that it’s absolutely pointless to give me a prediction that “could” happen years from now. So this person I was supposed to reconnect with was a reading from 7 years ago now and he is now married to the woman she swore he wouldn’t get married to.
I remember asking her sometimes about other non relationship questions and she was also just dead wrong.
She’s a good cold reader and after all this time and wasted money, I don’t recommend her.
whimerj:
--- Quote from: flora0250 on December 19, 2025, 06:16:22 AM ---It’s so frustrating to see all the reviews of hers deleted. Unless I’m missing something. I read with her recently again and against my better judgement. I believe more and more she is a cold reader and the things she got right in the past for me were either coincidence or based on probability of what what I fed her. I tried to be open minded but she again is feeding me the same reading that it won’t work out with this guy but you’ve got a new guy coming around the corner. Which is what she told me last time.
And I thought honestly that this latest interest was the guy she predicted coming around the corner as my happily ever after. So I give up with her. Because she has also gotten wrong in the past years ago telling me for sure I would reconnect with someone I never did. And what I mentioned before with her (and is true for any reader) is that it’s absolutely pointless to give me a prediction that “could” happen years from now. So this person I was supposed to reconnect with was a reading from 7 years ago now and he is now married to the woman she swore he wouldn’t get married to.
I remember asking her sometimes about other non relationship questions and she was also just dead wrong.
She’s a good cold reader and after all this time and wasted money, I don’t recommend her.
--- End quote ---
She's definitely not a cold reader. She has gotten numerous things correct for me that she could not have known. You can see old threads by using the way back machine by the way
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version