Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Keen.com
LadyPersephone
Truth:
i've also had times where LadyP has said exact words or expressed the same/similar feelings that others have said. like, literally.
she's still my top pick.
sanfranDave:
--- Quote from: Truth on September 27, 2013, 03:21:12 PM ---i've also had times where LadyP has said exact words or expressed the same/similar feelings that others have said. like, literally.
she's still my top pick.
--- End quote ---
Did you ever tell another psychic these words or description s of how someone feels before another one said them back to you?
I still think they share notes or keep a database and know it will impress you if they relay something the EXACT way you said it.
So you're thinking, "WOW! They really MUST be psychic. They said the EXACT WORDS the other person did!!"
I'm never impressed when a Psychic tells me something I've told another Psychic anymore. Used to believe in getting multiple readings to check "overlap" for verificatio n.
Now I would be more impressed if they did that when I hadn't told it to ANY Psychic before.
P.S. I figured out the quote thing. ;p
Bark angel:
--- Quote from: Synergy on September 27, 2013, 01:48:13 PM ---LadyP never led me on about this person. She actually was one of the few who didn't feed me a fairytale about him, and when she would bring him up on her own, would merely say there is unfinished business with us. In the past few months is when she began mentioning him more and specficiall y said we would date again... well, she says we COULD date again. She always said he'd circle back, but it'd be up to me and my approach if it were to pick up again.
Also, for those of you who know my story with C, no it wasn't completely unsolicited . I reached out to him in early August. Purely innocent and just to catch up as friends. We exchanged a few texts, but nothing more. It took him almost two full months to come forward with this invitiation . He randomly texted and now we have plans. I have no reason to believe this will be anything. I'm just excited because, of course, I know we have fun together and there was always chemistry. The issue here is that I can't be the same Synergy who was basically devasted and obsessed when it ended. I have to just take it for what it is, whatever that may be. Maybe it's not always about someone being "the one", and some situations can just be fun. Heck, I deserve a little fun! If it's with C, why not? ;)
--- End quote ---
Synergy,
Did LadyP endorse or encourage you reaching out to him -as a friendly gesture to catch up, or was it something you did yourself?
Synergy:
No. I don't ask about this man. I stopped asking awhile ago because he moved on with a new relationshi p. She would bring him up on his own. I was never encouraged to reach out. I did so because I wanted to. I didn't care what his reaction or response would be; I just wanted to do what I wanted to do, which was say hi and wish him a happy bday. Two months later, we'll be hanging out. It feels good doing what I wanted to do for once and not acting based upon what I'm told in readings. That's why I plan on keeping my promise to myself not to ask about this man anymore. Readings just screw everything up.
Bark angel:
Interesting .I think this is a good example of the positive influence "free will" can have. It's not always a downer. :-)
--- Quote from: Synergy on September 28, 2013, 08:40:04 AM ---No. I don't ask about this man. I stopped asking awhile ago because he moved on with a new relationshi p. She would bring him up on his own. I was never encouraged to reach out. I did so because I wanted to. I didn't care what his reaction or response would be; I just wanted to do what I wanted to do, which was say hi and wish him a happy bday. Two months later, we'll be hanging out. It feels good doing what I wanted to do for once and not acting based upon what I'm told in readings. That's why I plan on keeping my promise to myself not to ask about this man anymore. Readings just screw everything up.
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version