Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Keen.com
Spiritualist Reader (Cookie)
bstalling:
--- Quote from: Bark angel on November 04, 2013, 11:26:01 AM ---I believe that some of the negative comments on here can influence how we as clients begin to perceive the talents of the psychics in a completely different light.
I say this because I have experienced this and specifically with Cookie. I used to read rave reviews from Cookie, in terms of being a superb remote reader, on this forum. Then, some members posted that even though she had seen specific things that could be validated in readings, the predictions that Cookie had made did not turn out to be accurate. I can't say what has occurred with others, but I record my readings, and based on what I had been reading about Cookie's remote viewing not being all that important in the whole scheme of things, I tended not to replay my recording of the readings I had with her all that much.
Today, I chose to replay them and was shocked at just how accurate she really had been about the entire situation from the beginning!!! I have read with Cookie from December 2012 until now. About a dozen readings in all. After replaying all of these readings - it was alarming just how much of the first 5 minutes of her reading (without any prompting on my part) was totally accurate. I think she's been given a bad rap on here.
--- End quote ---
She has been given a bad wrap because she wasn't accurate for a lot of people in the end. Don't fall into the line of thinking that just because she was right for you that she can be consistent with everyone else.
skyline:
--- Quote from: copperhead on November 04, 2013, 07:21:26 AM ---
--- Quote from: skyline on November 03, 2013, 12:11:14 PM ---
Though I agree many readers will tell you about love interests and jobs in advance and it never happens, or it takes a long long time for it materialize.
--- End quote ---
Because, eventually, we do meet someone and eventually we do find a job. It's life, not psychic abilities.
--- End quote ---
Yeah, then we wonder why we spent all that money calling them instead of just letting things unfold naturally.
Bark angel:
Well, I just believe that when rating the services of any professional we should bear in mind that no one is 100% accurate. We shouldn't expect that of psychics either. However, I went through 12 readings - all at least 30 minutes each, and I have to say that the first details shared in the first 5 minutes were on point in each of the 12 readings. Where I think Cookie, and other psychics fall down is when asked to elaborate. I think its a natural tendency to fill in the blanks. We all do it - so I don't find it so shocking that psychics would have the same tendency either.
If I listen to the first things shared by Cookie, BEFORE I begin to ask questions (other than my one and only opener..."what do you see happening with XYZ?") she has in retrospect picked up every important even that has occurred in the last 12 months in my situation.
I, for one, still regard Cookie as being on point in all of my readings thus far...and for me that is one heck of a track record.
--- Quote from: bstalling on November 04, 2013, 11:56:48 AM ---
--- Quote from: Bark angel on November 04, 2013, 11:26:01 AM ---I believe that some of the negative comments on here can influence how we as clients begin to perceive the talents of the psychics in a completely different light.
I say this because I have experienced this and specifically with Cookie. I used to read rave reviews from Cookie, in terms of being a superb remote reader, on this forum. Then, some members posted that even though she had seen specific things that could be validated in readings, the predictions that Cookie had made did not turn out to be accurate. I can't say what has occurred with others, but I record my readings, and based on what I had been reading about Cookie's remote viewing not being all that important in the whole scheme of things, I tended not to replay my recording of the readings I had with her all that much.
Today, I chose to replay them and was shocked at just how accurate she really had been about the entire situation from the beginning!!! I have read with Cookie from December 2012 until now. About a dozen readings in all. After replaying all of these readings - it was alarming just how much of the first 5 minutes of her reading (without any prompting on my part) was totally accurate. I think she's been given a bad rap on here.
--- End quote ---
She has been given a bad wrap because she wasn't accurate for a lot of people in the end. Don't fall into the line of thinking that just because she was right for you that she can be consistent with everyone else.
--- End quote ---
Zee:
--- Quote ---I think she's been given a bad rap on here.
--- End quote ---
I disagree. I still try readers based on some of the reviews from this forum regardless if they worked for some of the callers or not. Even when posters say the reader was off, predictions didn’t pan out, they didn’t think the reader was psychic at all, whatever. Except for one thing: discourteous or flat out insolent readers. According to the caller’s review, if they say the caller hung up on them, acted like they were being interrupted, rushing them off the phone, ginormous egos like they were the right hand of god, or the reader was just an outright snot, I won’t call. I’m paying and you’re treating me like dirt? NOT! Sorry, that won’t be happening in my life time.
I often chalk up the reviews to either the caller was having a bad day and not receptive to the information, or the reader was having a bad day – because as we all know Every Reader doesn’t work for Everyone. Even when the review (from this forum) states the reader was negative, that still doesn’t sway me not to call. I look at what the reader offers, where their strengths lie, what tools they use (if any), and if I have to ask a lot of questions. I have no problem with direct, no b.s., honest readers. Personally I prefer them.
For some reason using the same reader over and over isn’t helpful either. They start to know you more, almost like a friend instead of a client and can no longer be objective/impartial when giving information. They feel to some degree they need to start giving you advice. If that’s the case, they shouldn’t be charging, but the weaker, cheaper readers I will still call, just for a pick me up pep talk. That’s all they’re good for anyway.
I just felt that for Cookie’s prices, nothing she said was mind blowing enough for me to review, let alone remember. I won’t call her back based on her rates, not because she didn’t work for me. I prefer readers who hit the ground running, with little or no information (which are extremely hard to find). The call was too short and from reading some of the reviews here, I was under the impression you have to give Cookie time in order to understand how she reads, in order to get the most out of your reading.
oben:
I agree with Bark angle on the fact that cookie's first couple of minutes that she talks without asking any questions are the best parts of her readings.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version