Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Keen.com
Spiritualist Reader (Cookie)
canary:
--- Quote from: Cfisher on August 03, 2012, 05:09:13 PM ---So, as I'm sure most of you know that my two fav's are northstarjulie and of course cookie monster aka the oracle.
In my last reading, don't laugh you guys, but she brought Julie up in my reading! I was like wtf? Lol! Now, she didn't know what Julie does, but needless to say, I just about fell off my chair when she told me how much of a support person Julie is for me and a good friend blah, blah, blah! But seriously? C'mon cookie monster! You aren't supposed to be picking up other readers, BY NAME for goodness sake! I actually told Julie about it and her and I shared a good giggle over that! And she didn't get upset about me cheating on her or anything! Love Julie! Amazing woman!
As for names, she's pulled one of my guy's kids names out of a hat, this girl on my baseball team, my cousin-in-law's name and then two names of two different women that I don't know yet, or maybe I do and it's one of you suckers on here!!!
She's given detailed descriptions of me being somewhere when something, that had absolutely nothing to do with nothing. And told me something was going to happen when I didn't think in a million years it would happen again. Ya, she's kinda rad. I'll definitely give her that :) adore her to pieces...
--- End quote ---
Hi CFisher, and anybody else here who can shed some light on this:
Your account of Cookie experiences are enviable - wow! I am trying to have better use for the random information I receive in some of the readings, such as meaningfully interpret numbers like "I get a 5, I am seeing 6s and 7s", names of people, etc. We get readings to get clued into a situation that is opaque, but a lot of this type of information does not necessarily lend to making things even a bit transparent. Also, I find that such information is verifiable only after the fact IF they happen to check out. If they do not check out, we will not even remember the random numbers that were coughed up in the reading. What I mean is, they do not necessarily serve as any pointers ahead of the events expected to transpire. For eg. I am surrounded by ethnic names in the situation I call about. Cookie mentioned some names in my reading too - not ethnic for sure - and the names did not have any context to the reading, nor my life in general. What exactly do these names do for your readings? Do these readers provide any meaningful context around the names they bring up, or do these names just get mentioned and they end up being people you know? I am impressed by all the Cookie experiences I read here, and wonder why my readings with her were not precise or informative. Her prediction in response to one very critical question I had asked, bombed badly! Because the “Oracle” had spoken, I was quite chuffed and went away feeling it was all good. Oh my! What a blow when it went totally the opposite way… Aaarhg! Is there a particular approach/style to getting an accurate reading? Should it be different from being open, giving the reader a short synopsis of the situation, some names, and then asking the questions? I thought that was too much info for any good reader already. The ones that impressed me (and were accurate in their predictions as well) stopped me from going beyond my name and the name of the person I was asking about, and they brought forth so much more intel. What's the secret to an accurate and useful reading with the likes of Cookie? Any suggestions?
loops77:
One thing about the names...it isnt necessarily someone significant. For example, a few years ago a reader mentioned a certain name that was very unique. Turns out a few months later that he was my recruiter when I was looking for a job. He didnt help me get one...but somhow the reader picked that up...and I wasnt inquring about work.
Cfisher:
@canary- the cookie prediction that bombed. Was it one of those things where she describes stuff and the situation but the perception/feelings of everything was completely different than how you thought it was? I'm just curious... As in speaking to others, her romantic cues seem to be off. For example: cookie sees a conversation in some room and presumes its a conversation about feelings or something, but the way it actually panned out happened to be talking about work or something. This seems to be a common theme with Cookie... She sees it as something romantic, when it's not at all.
Cfisher:
@canary... The way I read with Cookie is to say nothing. I let her allow the info to flow. I ask a general what's up and coming with work, or relationships etc. I even asked her the last time I read with her, what am I supposed to do right now? Clearly, I'm bored... And she hit a few things that made sense, pulled a name out of her hat of someone I'm relatively close to and I feel I can just carry on...
But when I read with anyone other than my two main squeezes, I NEVER give any info at all, except for a name and a completely general question. Very general with someone new. That's how I figure out if they've connected. And after all the readings I've had in my adult life, I can usually tell within 30 seconds to 1 minute if they are connected.
canary:
--- Quote from: Cfisher on August 03, 2012, 06:53:14 PM ---@canary- the cookie prediction that bombed. Was it one of those things where she describes stuff and the situation but the perception/feelings of everything was completely different than how you thought it was? I'm just curious... As in speaking to others, her romantic cues seem to be off. For example: cookie sees a conversation in some room and presumes its a conversation about feelings or something, but the way it actually panned out happened to be talking about work or something. This seems to be a common theme with Cookie... She sees it as something romantic, when it's not at all.
--- End quote ---
I distinctly remember the situation was work related. First, whatever she described about the confusion there was off the mark. I did not want to split hairs over details I could not make sense of even when I gave her the benefit of the doubt, and so asked her for the final outcome. Her prediction was completely opposite of what came to rest, and it was barely less than 6 weeks out. She picked up on my guys feelings - hope they were right - and then there were some shots in the dark - "is he married? he does not look available..." No ma'am - he is not married, is very available, desirable but tongue-tied about us. Just tell me what I need to know about where this is going!! Then I got some current stuff, but the outcome predicted got lost in the weeds when she said I could meet somebody else! That was a cheap shot at a prediction for me, for any trend line even remotely psychic could have seen that to be untrue. Very unnecessary, and sure enough - nothing like that happened - not even remotely. Enough time has gone by now, to come to a conclusion on that prediction as well. It would have been awesome had she been right about the work situation - she would have set me ahead, but that was serious damage instead. There was nothing for me to do either, to blame it on free will and say I changed the reading, but not. Lesson learned. I get readings but do not rest on them and stop living. Some things however are situations like the one from work, where there is nothing to be done but wait. I think you were the one that said somewhere that she is a remote viewer (RV). I did not try her from that angle, but the info I was seeking was not the RV type. RV types work great for questions related to current situations, exes, etc I suppose.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version