Relationship Psychology Discussions > The Vent
The psychics Vent
HornetKick:
--- Quote from: jhuskindle on December 13, 2018, 02:53:00 PM ---What we can see here in your own words is that you confirm information by using subjective interpretat ion of symbolism (card reading) rather than confirming it with what the client knows or believes to be true. And it sounds like this is a habit. And, if the clients knows for certain you are wrong, they have no way to prove it to you, and you may not believe it anyway. The clients who know you are wrong are not going to contact you again, and because of this, you may go on believing you were correct when you were in fact NOT correct.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: star1 on December 13, 2018, 08:19:37 PM ---This is why I am not keen on cards.. They can be so inaccurate, and when a reader is seeing something in their cards (not talking specificall y to Kindle - in general), they can be adamant that the cards are not wrong when they are alot of the time.
--- End quote ---
Exactly. Cards are not fail-safe, nor are psychics for that matter.
jhuskindle:
--- Quote from: HornetKick on December 14, 2018, 08:59:44 AM ---
--- Quote from: jhuskindle on December 13, 2018, 02:53:00 PM ---What we can see here in your own words is that you confirm information by using subjective interpretat ion of symbolism (card reading) rather than confirming it with what the client knows or believes to be true. And it sounds like this is a habit. And, if the clients knows for certain you are wrong, they have no way to prove it to you, and you may not believe it anyway. The clients who know you are wrong are not going to contact you again, and because of this, you may go on believing you were correct when you were in fact NOT correct.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: star1 on December 13, 2018, 08:19:37 PM ---This is why I am not keen on cards.. They can be so inaccurate, and when a reader is seeing something in their cards (not talking specificall y to Kindle - in general), they can be adamant that the cards are not wrong when they are alot of the time.
--- End quote ---
Exactly. Cards are not fail-safe, nor are psychics for that matter.
--- End quote ---
Agreed. That’s why I use both. My platform allows 2 mo to follow up. That’s plenty of time for January to come and go!
I see people call th empress a pregnancy all th time, it can’t be in my readings unless it has two other cards next to it indicating pregnancy. Otherwise it’s just describing a beautiful creative woman that many men admire and is strong by her own right And usually very funny. If with other pregnancy card sure.
Shuffling 3x and getting the same combo sure I could be wrong but why not wait until January to find out? Many people here end up saying they were in denial if they got something negative. Totally fine but hold th review!
And of course why I always encourage people to test on a very short period, like how will my party go on Friday? So there’s no questions, is she accurate?
chrys1234:
Did you find out then if the dude is married?
In 2018 I had a lot of readings including card readers, not one told me that the dude was married and with a kid on the way....
Now explain that.
I agree that cards are really inaccurate and unreliable
HornetKick:
--- Quote from: aquagirl on December 13, 2018, 07:37:05 PM ---
--- Quote from: Still tired on December 11, 2018, 10:56:04 PM ---Why are you here gossiping about what people tell you in readings? That should be kept private.
--- End quote ---
This right here! Thank you. I was thinking the same. There is is a code of ethics readers much follow, and sharing people's personal information publicly and for your own amusement is not only unethical but shameful.
--- End quote ---
I found this comment astounding. Readers/Psychics whatever you call them do not have any code of ethics. They didn't raise their right hands and swear an oath to anything or anyone. They logged onto a platform and started taking calls. I'm not taking sides, just pointing out the facts that readers are just people and clients need to be careful what they tell readers. Placing these people on high pedestals is dangerous.
dascallie:
Looks like I'm in minority but I don't see how it's is unethical to describe case studies (in this case, psychic readings) when there is no identifying names or places.
We learn in this world by observing, watching outcomes, examples of others.
All the self-help books contain case studies of real people with excruciatin gly detailed scenarios.
But their identificat ions are either aliases like Sarah M, or 'Patient A', 'Client S', etc
It's information . It's the way life rolls---observing, reading about others--as well of course, our own direct experience--is how we learn, how we discern. Some of it is junk, some of it is useful---some of it we may see ourselves in, and it can be helpful getting that wake up call.
I think jumping on this person as unethical makes zero sense.
She's giving you a view into the human psyche as she has experiences it as a psychic. I think it's pretty enlightenin g. To me that's worth hearing about--lest I recognize myself--I may be motivated to discern between hopeful optimism and obsessive, destructive denial.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version