My experience with her is.. I wouldn’t say cryptic.. but she needs validation what she sees. Example: the situation is my POI doesn’t like his career and wants to go completely different route but he doesn’t know anything about it and it’s making him miserable, stress and nervous about it.
My trusted advisor: he is very confused about what to do with his career. He spent 7 (yes she said 7, without my input) years of his time, effort, education and money on this career and now he’s realizing it’s not for him. It’s stressing him out and he can’t handle anymore than this.
Kate marquez: “it looks like he’s concern about money, but not the lack of it.. it’s not like he doesn’t have it, but something about the inflow of it.”. Then I’ll say “oh it’s because he’s not happy what he’s doing and he want to try something else. Kate marquez: oh ok ok that makes sense.
But all these I can validate with my poi.
How is this not cryptic? Can you see that no matter what his financial situation is, you can make it fit into what she said? Also, if he's concerned about the "inflow" of it then he IS concerned by the lack of it...it's contradicto ry and covers every possibility of his situation.. .If she said, "he is the concerned by the TYPE of inflow, aka where his coming is coming from" that would be different. But this is cryptic.
The "inflow" literally IS where it's coming from lol. It's just semantics, really though. She also only does chat so it's probably hard to get her point across while typing. You can't just parse a chat up to consider each part, you have to take the whole paragraph as one piece. For an energy reader, she saw the things that were happening.. Stress around the money but she specificall
y said it's not a lack of money. The problem is in the inflow. But we also don't know the rest of the conversatio
n either, and I don't think whskers wants to put the whole convo up.
I think the fact that she's proven with at least a few of us that she's absolutely psychic, means that she's not just making stuff up and being general with just a couple people. She's psychic so she doesn't need to. And if she wasn't psychic, that would be her M.O. for all of us but there's no freaking way she would know some of the things she knows. Just like with any other psychic, she won't connect with everyone. I'm sure she also has bad days just like every other psychic as well. I would and have said the same thing about other psychics on here. It's super disappointi
ng if a psychic doesn't work for you who worked amazingly for everyone else. I get that. It's also a waste of money. But getting readings period is a waste of money as it is so I just take them off my list when that happens and I don't think about it again. I only really write bad reviews (on here or on the sites) when it was obvious that they weren't even trying to give me an honest psychic reading. If they honestly tried, and the info was just wrong, then it's just a connection issue, provided there is some other evidence that they're psychic. But yeah, for a chat reader, the actual wordage can be an issue. But the benefit is we have transcripts to look at later and to back check the readings. We don't have that with a phone reader so I think they can get away with more vague or wrong predictions than a chat reader. It's a matter of preference for sure.
