Calypso,
I understand your point, and please don't mistake this post as one advocating ALL psychics or claiming that all psychics have talent, because it isn't.
What perplexes me is that I can't see how a psychic can have enough talent to see details of our private lives, both past and present and yet have no talent being able to see what might happen in the near future. That's all. I am convinced that there is more to it than just the psychic telling us what is to happen. I believe we play a role in how the future plays out as well, and that just might account for why so many readers are, as you call it, accurate on some things and yet so "dead wrong" on final outcomes. Doesn't that just make you a little curious? How is it I can read with a psychic that can tell me without any input from me just how my life has been, and with whom and what lead up to today and yet they are completely incapable of telling me what can happen tomorrow?
Are you also one that is tied to timing of events? Because perhaps what is to happen in some cases hasn't happened yet...for one or more reasons, so how do we know so definitively that the psychics were wrong?
I had a reading with my first psychic in 1993. I was so naiive I didn't even know what to ask, so you can be sure I did not ask "when?" but the reader told of me of my future husband. What he looked like, where he would be living and a little of his past. It happened, just as predicted. But he was not my husband until 2000 - 7 years after the reading! I could have assumed in 1995 since I had no husband that the psychic was wrong. I could have assumed in 1998, again without this husband in my life, that the psychic was wrong, and again in 1999, but in 2000 when I actually married this man could I then insist the psychic was wrong?
Bark,
The point was that the psychics were wrong about the final outcomes they gave so what point is it giving credit for other things they got "right."
I guess I'm firm on this because a common thread I've seen is that readers are both right and wrong but in the end they are dead wrong!!
Why highlight the few areas they are right. I try to think about others on the forum and know that those still stuck in the cycle will cling to that rather than the truth about just how wrong readers are.