Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Storefront Psychics & Online Services
Bitwine
Love2lovenj:
--- Quote from: almondtree on May 25, 2019, 02:21:58 AM ---Angel Readings told me that one of my son’s friends is in danger. She even mentioned the name of that person, but my son denies that he knows any person with that name. I am confused which to believe. Does anyone have Angel Readings mention similar things?
--- End quote ---
If your son doesn't know anyone by that name i wouldn't worry about it. She isn't perfect and apparently seems to be off with this.
Dnj1984:
She has been wildly accurate for me... and the names she threw out were names I knew. My mind was blown. We were in such a “groove” she went way over (10 minutes) on my reading to let me ask questions ect. I like her!
Also... she changes her name according to A. The moon cycle or B. A promotion she’s doing. She’s definitely not trying to hide or “deceive” anyone. lol
persephone:
--- Quote from: josh34 on May 25, 2019, 06:03:58 AM ---
--- Quote from: happyk on May 25, 2019, 06:02:12 AM ---
--- Quote from: josh34 on May 25, 2019, 05:57:15 AM ---
--- Quote from: happyk on May 25, 2019, 05:52:38 AM ---
--- Quote from: josh34 on May 25, 2019, 05:27:55 AM ---
--- Quote from: happyk on May 25, 2019, 05:19:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: almondtree on May 25, 2019, 02:21:58 AM ---Angel Readings told me that one of my son’s friends is in danger. She even mentioned the name of that person, but my son denies that he knows any person with that name. I am confused which to believe. Does anyone have Angel Readings mention similar things?
--- End quote ---
Tread softly. You can't believe everything they say. I don't think it's ethical for them to name someone as a source of danger or being in danger when we know they're not even 50% accurate.
--- End quote ---
Seriously not trying to start anything (I really don't want to argue, so please don't think I'm trying to. I just want to say something) She's been accurate for me, as well as others. And each psychic connects differently to each and every person, so I don't think saying, "When we know they're not even 50% accurate" is a conclusion we can draw as fact. She might be wrong she might be right, but I think to put a definitive on that like that isn't fair to her. Again not trying to start anything. I really don't want to argue and I'm not in the emotional space to do so right now. I'm just trying to level things.
--- End quote ---
Look at the situation. She's not telling someone about them receiving a call from POI or not, it's a more serious matter. Don't try to dismiss my opinion. I'm just as entitled to my opinions. If you're not in a good emotional space may be work on that and stop defending psychics and stop coming after me. It's getting too old.
--- End quote ---
Not coming after you and not baselessly defending. I know she works for some, and I think putting a "less than 50% accuracy" label on her is kind of a baseless assumption to make, based upon absolutely nothing-especially when she's worked for many others. But as with any psychic, nobody is 100% and nobody connects well with everybody..
But I wasn't trying to start anything, as I've explained. All I was trying to do was make a statement, and play devil's advocate. That's all. This doesn't have to be an argument. I don't feel I said anything wrong, or argumentative. But I'll butt out now. Thank you for listening. Best wishes.
--- End quote ---
It's not baseless but yea butt out and stay that way but I know you have to have your last word in so go ahead and say whatever you want to. Nobody cares.
--- End quote ---
That was highly unnecessary of you to say, and very rude... but... Um. Ok... butting out... Have a great night.
--- End quote ---
I don’t think she was rude, she expressed her opinion and you should respect that.
josh34:
--- Quote from: persephone on May 25, 2019, 06:14:58 PM ---
--- Quote from: josh34 on May 25, 2019, 06:03:58 AM ---
--- Quote from: happyk on May 25, 2019, 06:02:12 AM ---
--- Quote from: josh34 on May 25, 2019, 05:57:15 AM ---
--- Quote from: happyk on May 25, 2019, 05:52:38 AM ---
--- Quote from: josh34 on May 25, 2019, 05:27:55 AM ---
--- Quote from: happyk on May 25, 2019, 05:19:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: almondtree on May 25, 2019, 02:21:58 AM ---Angel Readings told me that one of my son’s friends is in danger. She even mentioned the name of that person, but my son denies that he knows any person with that name. I am confused which to believe. Does anyone have Angel Readings mention similar things?
--- End quote ---
Tread softly. You can't believe everything they say. I don't think it's ethical for them to name someone as a source of danger or being in danger when we know they're not even 50% accurate.
--- End quote ---
Seriously not trying to start anything (I really don't want to argue, so please don't think I'm trying to. I just want to say something) She's been accurate for me, as well as others. And each psychic connects differently to each and every person, so I don't think saying, "When we know they're not even 50% accurate" is a conclusion we can draw as fact. She might be wrong she might be right, but I think to put a definitive on that like that isn't fair to her. Again not trying to start anything. I really don't want to argue and I'm not in the emotional space to do so right now. I'm just trying to level things.
--- End quote ---
Look at the situation. She's not telling someone about them receiving a call from POI or not, it's a more serious matter. Don't try to dismiss my opinion. I'm just as entitled to my opinions. If you're not in a good emotional space may be work on that and stop defending psychics and stop coming after me. It's getting too old.
--- End quote ---
Not coming after you and not baselessly defending. I know she works for some, and I think putting a "less than 50% accuracy" label on her is kind of a baseless assumption to make, based upon absolutely nothing-especially when she's worked for many others. But as with any psychic, nobody is 100% and nobody connects well with everybody..
But I wasn't trying to start anything, as I've explained. All I was trying to do was make a statement, and play devil's advocate. That's all. This doesn't have to be an argument. I don't feel I said anything wrong, or argumentative. But I'll butt out now. Thank you for listening. Best wishes.
--- End quote ---
It's not baseless but yea butt out and stay that way but I know you have to have your last word in so go ahead and say whatever you want to. Nobody cares.
--- End quote ---
That was highly unnecessary of you to say, and very rude... but... Um. Ok... butting out... Have a great night.
--- End quote ---
I don’t think she was rude, she expressed her opinion and you should respect that.
--- End quote ---
Then you're misreading, because the way that was stated, was very clearly and objectively rude. "I know you have to have your last word in so go ahead and say whatever you want to. Nobody cares.". If that's not rude to you, then you're either being biased toward one member over another, or you're choosing not to address what was written. No matter which way you spin it, that was very rude; objectively and entirely rude, and spoken out of anger. And of course I will respect her opinion, which I already said I had. Have a nice day. But let us get back onto the topic of bitwine, yes? :)
--- Quote from: Dnj1984 on May 25, 2019, 12:28:29 PM ---She has been wildly accurate for me... and the names she threw out were names I knew. My mind was blown. We were in such a “groove” she went way over (10 minutes) on my reading to let me ask questions ect. I like her!
Also... she changes her name according to A. The moon cycle or B. A promotion she’s doing. She’s definitely not trying to hide or “deceive” anyone. lol
--- End quote ---
I agree:) Not every psychic connects well with each and every person, as we are all different. But personally, I think she is quite good.
Lovefash67:
I really want to speak with ari but whenever I’m notified that she is on she is talking to someone else and then she goes offline each time . Does she have a queue
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version