Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Storefront Psychics & Online Services

Bitwine

<< < (123/143) > >>

unicornlove:
right it does get to be confusing  ??? that's why i want to read with reputable readers. But i know who is accurate for one person may not be for another. Readings are confusing in general.  :-\

i wish i knew who people recommended on bitwine  :'( everyone's experience is different I know. But i read good things about one reader, and then people say 'she's not accurate', 'her predictions didnt happen', she fairy tale // sugar coat.  :(

marciamia:

--- Quote from: Serendipity on March 04, 2019, 12:39:36 AM ---
--- Quote from: unicornlove on March 03, 2019, 09:50:48 PM ---Obviously i wanted to read with reputable readers.  :D not waste money on fairy tales.

I have been waiting to read with Ms Ann, Raynee, but i dont think they were on today.

--- End quote ---

Hey, so Raynee didn't work for me, she said he would not reach out in Jan or Feb and we wouldn't see each other...it would take him a long time. He reached out in Jan so just letting you know..contact predictions weren't accurate for me, and also progression of the relationship she predicted is questionable. She also wasn't accurate in a couple other details for me so..

--- End quote ---

I think I started a thread on Raynee because she doesn’t just read on bitwine. She said something really alarming to me that I’m like a million % positive is wrong just so she could get a rise out of me and get me upset and spend more money with her. Won’t read with her again even if she was able to pick up the past well.

Serendipity:
Yeah it's a tough call, I've just stuck to one website: bitwine, not the most reliable one ..lol but not really in the space to create new accounts on other sites for some reason!

I went on a binge awhile back, like for a week or two, and started narrowing down the readers, most of them were recommended frequently in this forum, then I just gave the reader a chance or two, some no chances if they don't resonate, some I X out of chat because I knew they were not real, and eventually I've narrowed it down to 1..maybe 2 now.

So I think it may take some time to see who connects with you, and the reason I keep posting about someone working for me and not working for me (both actually), is because I want other members on the forum to see one reader may work for someone else but it didn't for me. It'll be a judgment call you make! Don't take the ones that say "predictions came true or didnt come true" too seriously because, really we are just posting to gather some data here :)

Love2lovenj:
I prefer Bitwine because i like be able to go thru the transcript.  Maybe checkout the thread for the reading came true.  You know when you go to a reading maybe ask something that you can verify to see if the reader is connected.

applecheeks:

--- Quote from: Natashanyc on March 03, 2019, 10:33:36 AM ---
--- Quote from: Flyingsoul on March 03, 2019, 02:17:06 AM ---@unicorn, oh it was you reading with her earlier :) I noticed that you like to leave only satisfactory review to reader who told you negative outcome. We don’t do that, we leave review based on the accuracy not your expected readings because this is not fair to any good reader. By the way I haven’t read with Ari.

--- End quote ---

I agree don’t discredit the advisor just because you got bad news... we have been battling this false reality of ppl getting reads n giving reviews based on “not wanting to hear the truth” so please stop doing this. Just talk to a friend if u want to here a fairy tale...why leave feedback that is not honest

--- End quote ---

I went and looked at the ones she has mentioned giving her negative outcomes. Not only is she giving them all neutrals, but she is word for word giving them all the same feedback as well. So if someone over there picks-up on that, it might be seen as abusive. It also makes it obvious she is only seeking to hear what she wants to hear since she gives those ones green.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version