Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Bitwine
My Bitwine experience - Rachel Marie, ARI etc
Stone88:
--- Quote from: Chitowngirl on August 25, 2023, 02:31:01 PM ---SHADY! I know this is public so anyone can view it and/or comment if they've been approved. Like anything in this world, not everyone is going to like her or feel she works for her. There are also a lot of people that love her and believe in her. I think you should add your comment to her personal subject title on here too so others who search her name also know. For me the worst part is to deactivate reviews. FALSE ADVERTISING! That's something I take issue with. If you're a true psychic and take pride in what you do that also means some bad comes with it sometimes, maybe try brushing it off because you're not going to work for everyone. No one psychic has all good reviews no matter who they are.
--- End quote ---
I totally agree with you Chitowngirl. Shes clearly not genuine. I did wonder how has she barely got any negative reviews. But now I know what she does... she just deactivates the feedback link.
Annettemaries prediction didn't pass for me and I gave her my honest feedback, which she didn't like, but at least she took it on the chin.
Not every psychic is gonna work like you said, but at least be ethical enough to allow paying clients to leave feedback and not take it personally.
I took screenshots of the chat. I just couldn't believe it LOL.
Stone88:
--- Quote from: Mina on August 25, 2023, 02:47:22 PM ---Booo hiss 🐍 throws popcorn 🍿
I shouldn’t be surprised though. A reader i read with on keen once said her “fans” (short for fanatics, when you look up the word) pointed this out to me, when I wrote about them on this forum.
It’s disappointing
But it’s true if you write a readers name info here expect this
--- End quote ---
Isn't it so sad... and then they claim to be genuine and natural born psychics. If your as great as you say you are then why do you need to lurk or need lurkers reporting back to you. Period.
Natashanyc:
--- Quote from: Stone88 on August 25, 2023, 03:41:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: Mina on August 25, 2023, 02:47:22 PM ---Booo hiss 🐍 throws popcorn 🍿
I shouldn’t be surprised though. A reader i read with on keen once said her “fans” (short for fanatics, when you look up the word) pointed this out to me, when I wrote about them on this forum.
It’s disappointing
But it’s true if you write a readers name info here expect this
--- End quote ---
Isn't it so sad... and then they claim to be genuine and natural born psychics. If your as great as you say you are then why do you need to lurk or need lurkers reporting back to you. Period.
--- End quote ---
This is hilarious but I’m not surprised. I don’t even use bitwine but they have always been shady. It shows major insecurity of you need a mole and as an advisor, confronting those who use this site is childish. The sole purpose of this site is to expose honest reviews bc the platform reviews are compromised. There’s a reason most sites don’t post negative feedback or quickly delete it. It’s so these people will APPEAR accurate when you are vulnerable looking for answers. There are psychos who harass advisors and attempt to tarnish their reputation but deal with those ppl accordingly. Genuine clients should be able to post genuine reviews after their PAID service just like Yelp & Google. My advice if u are going to continue on these shady platforms is to have a user name other than the username u use there. If there is a mole here, don’t tell anyone your personal business ie; names, location , age….and keep it general here for (example ” Advisor Apple Was inaccurate at contact for me or Advisor Apple was great at remote viewing my situation and predictions passed about getting my promotion at work). Always be aware this is a public forum and even tho many don’t post, there are MANY people who lurk here continuously. I received emails from frauds in the past and they are persistent with logging in here for their gain. Idk if either of Marie or Ari is gifted but lurking is a bit much being that they been in the field this long.
Stone88:
Thank you Natasha.
I will just avoid Bitwine all together I think. After that situation I can't trust the readers on there.i still can't believe it and she's meant to be one of th "best" ones on that site.
And thank you for the advice, I won't be as specific in my posts going forwards.
Btw can you recommend any good ethical sites/ psychics?
Chitowngirl:
--- Quote from: Stone88 on August 25, 2023, 03:33:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chitowngirl on August 25, 2023, 02:31:01 PM ---SHADY! I know this is public so anyone can view it and/or comment if they've been approved. Like anything in this world, not everyone is going to like her or feel she works for her. There are also a lot of people that love her and believe in her. I think you should add your comment to her personal subject title on here too so others who search her name also know. For me the worst part is to deactivate reviews. FALSE ADVERTISING! That's something I take issue with. If you're a true psychic and take pride in what you do that also means some bad comes with it sometimes, maybe try brushing it off because you're not going to work for everyone. No one psychic has all good reviews no matter who they are.
--- End quote ---
I totally agree with you Chitowngirl. Shes clearly not genuine. I did wonder how has she barely got any negative reviews. But now I know what she does... she just deactivates the feedback link.
Annettemaries prediction didn't pass for me and I gave her my honest feedback, which she didn't like, but at least she took it on the chin.
Not every psychic is gonna work like you said, but at least be ethical enough to allow paying clients to leave feedback and not take it personally.
I took screenshots of the chat. I just couldn't believe it LOL.
--- End quote ---
Good for you for taking screenshots! The other thing that is annoying is that some of them (Ari especially) feel the need to defend themselves for every single negative review they're given. I understand sometimes they are genuinely not given a fair shot because they told someone something they didn't want to hear and that person wrote an unfair negative review as a result but to argue over the fact that you were just plain wrong about predictions or whatever it may be is just immature. Just own that you're not always going to be correct. They're like the weatherman, they can be wrong 80% of the time and STILL keep their jobs.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version