Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Keen.com
Exposing FAKES on KEEN - read this and save yourself some serious $$$
TulipsAndSunflowers:
That doesn’t mean that what they’re doing is moral. And as I mentioned above, there are people who will believe that these are the people who are behind the screen and that’s just not cool.... particularly not for a ‘reader’ charging $50 a minute. This is not about who works for whom.
Natashanyc:
When I was binging I didn’t care what the advisor looked like. I didn’t read based on looks but I can understand how a picture would be misleading as being welcoming. It’s also a public domain so I could see why they would want to protect their privacy to avoid psychos and dramatic clients. It’s funny how advisors are always here to defend themselves but they miss these kinds of threads that expose their peers of being fake
njlady:
--- Quote from: TulipsAndSunflowers on June 17, 2021, 11:46:49 AM ---That doesn’t mean that what they’re doing is moral. And as I mentioned above, there are people who will believe that these are the people who are behind the screen and that’s just not cool.... particularly not for a ‘reader’ charging $50 a minute. This is not about who works for whom.
--- End quote ---
Someone charging "$50 a minute" is not a real psychic. They are preying on the desperate. That's a no-brainer. The obvious doesn't need "exposing".
Many people don't use their real photo or use a very old one because there are crazy people out there. Reverse searches are popular. Who wants someone showing up on your doorstep. There are unbalanced people here, would you want them showing up at your house? If a see a photo of Ganesh, I don't think "oh wow, I'm talking to a Hindu God!", I think I'm talking to a person who is using that photo.
Using a stock photo can also help the phone lines from finding out about their personal site because a lot of lines prohibit this.
You're putting an awful lot of energy into "exposing" the obvious.
jhuskindle:
--- Quote from: jas on June 17, 2021, 11:22:50 AM ---It is perfectly okay to use a picture that is in a public domain - not illegal in the US. I wouldn't put to much energy into this - just find a psychic that works for you. Remember not all psychics work for everyone. I have three that I use, and love them, but they may not connect with you like they do with me. I think the majority of us who have been reading with psychics for a long time, know that the pictures aren't real.
--- End quote ---
Best psychics I have ever read with wouldnt dare put their photo online, they always use fakes.
Ive also met quite a few that are too SHY to put them up. This means literally nothing.
TulipsAndSunflowers:
Then instead of using photos of strangers, use one of a mountain or a flower or whatever. Simple.
I don’t like this and there are others who don’t either. If you don’t mind paying someone with a fake photo hundreds of dollars for just a few minutes of talking to them, then that’s fine, it’s your money and you can spend it on whatever you like. Same goes for my energy. I shall use it on whatever I desire. If you don’t like the post, nobody is forcing you to comment.
I said nothing against readers who use photos of their pets or nature etc etc- that’s different and if you don’t get it, then there’s no point in discussing this any further.
Thank you. ;)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version