Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Keen.com
LadyPersephone
Zee:
Well, I never go through all the trouble of ‘considering the source’ when feedback is left. I take it for what it is and how that person possibly felt at the time. But in saying that I also look at the kind of feedback left. I completely disagree when readers are rated a 1 or 2 star for technical issues (as if it were their fault). And although I’m not that familiar with LadyP (a short read some time ago), I do know some readers are snarky and have issues just like everybody else. Sometimes when they say they don’t know, just means they can’t interpret. I do get there are some things they aren’t suppose to know, but act like they do and just say anything.
I just found the review interesting and the fact it was so recent. I spent $20 bucks on a 5 min call to her in March and she gave no direction, nor help actually. I asked about a business I started and a civil case I was involved with and nothing she said pointed me N,S,E or W. I guess I could give her another shot, but I generally disregard emphatic readers (only reading with her due to this forum), unless they have definitive concrete C’s backing their emphatic-ness (Clairvoyance, Clairsentience, Clairaudience).
marybell:
--- Quote from: Zee on August 29, 2013, 02:41:34 PM ---Well, I never go through all the trouble of ‘considering the source’ when feedback is left. I take it for what it is and how that person possibly felt at the time. But in saying that I also look at the kind of feedback left. I completely disagree when readers are rated a 1 or 2 star for technical issues (as if it were their fault). And although I’m not that familiar with LadyP (a short read some time ago), I do know some readers are snarky and have issues just like everybody else. Sometimes when they say they don’t know, just means they can’t interpret. I do get there are some things they aren’t suppose to know, but act like they do and just say anything.
I just found the review interesting and the fact it was so recent. I spent $20 bucks on a 5 min call to her in March and she gave no direction, nor help actually. I asked about a business I started and a civil case I was involved with and nothing she said pointed me N,S,E or W. I guess I could give her another shot, but I generally disregard emphatic readers (only reading with her due to this forum), unless they have definitive concrete C’s backing their emphatic-ness (Clairvoyance, Clairsentience, Clairaudience).
--- End quote ---
Zee
I always consider the source, esp. when they leave feedback in caps because it's overkill. I agree with KTH. With so many advisers giving us Disney answers, it's refreshing and impressive to see one who admits she does not know the answer. At present I do not get readings since I do not need them plus I get coached by my long time adviser who knows too much about me to actually be an objective psychic. I continue to come to the forum, mostly hoping to find a new adviser who seems honest and gifted. It seems like LadyPersephone is and I will call her when I need an actual reading. I find if an adviser does not read for me well the first time , they are off the second time as well. I have given a few people second chances because of the wonderful reviews they have received here, and it did not pan out for me. Please share with us whether she is better for you the second time around :)
Zee:
No I get what both of you are saying, but I had a reading from some psycho on Keen and every question she would answer with I don't know. And she would just sit there. Not say we aren't connecting or I'm not picking up on anything. (I've posted about this before) I said okay, was very cordial and rang off. I gave her a 1 rating and she sent me a threatening email saying she does spells. It didn't occur to me then, but I should have reported her for just being a B!tch. In hindsight, was she really expecting a 5 star because she was so honest with her I don't knows? Seriously?
I know the difference between the honest ones who say right off the bat, they aren't connecting: I've tried twice with Kisha and got this from her straight away. She even suggested to ask for a refund.
I would much prefer if a reader says they aren't connecting rather than an 'I don't know,' otherwise why are they charging me? Soul Love has been hit/miss for some but if I ask a question and she doesn't have an answer, she will say the guides aren't giving her an answer. That sounds much more legitimate than not knowing something I'm paying for.
--- Quote ---I find if an adviser does not read for me well the first time , they are off the second time as well. I have given a few people second chances because of the wonderful reviews they have received here, and it did not pan out for me.
--- End quote ---
Yeah, I don't usually go in for a second time if they just sucked horribly the first go round. Sometimes just based on the reviews here, I'll give it another go, especially once I understand how the reader, reads. I've had readers once and they were terrific whereas the second or third read was totally off. So, it kind of goes both ways.
Personally, I am more wary of glowing reviews--especially if it's the same person calling every other day. I always look at the negative ratings. Always.
bstalling:
I did end up trying her and she was refreshingly insightful. She seems rather grounded in her answers. To me, I Don't Know= I'm Not Getting Information On That. I don't think she would be intentionally lazy about getting an answer. LP seems like one of the better readers for insight...waiting for predictions from her to happen.
Luckystar:
"I feel that bowbow09 should have looked at the information ladyp gave her and rated the call from that, I know first hand that LadyP does get the now correct and the outcome is a toss up"
I agree.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version