Relationship Psychology Discussions > The Vent

Legit Question

<< < (2/2)

Fidget1028:
I try to give fair and balanced reporting whether they're heavy hitters or not. There have been a few heavy hitters that don't work for me at all (Cookie, QoCs, Mattie come to mind). Sometimes they get random stuff, but it's usually general, insignificant, or just not useful things. I've gotten to a point that I prefer general readings and predictions without timelines. I also prefer when a reader openly admits they can't connect with you or can't get anything on a particular situation. My experience is that this is most common with the heavy hitters because they usually have their own site where you schedule a reading for a set amount of time and not per minute. When they're wrong, they're wrong though. After years of readings, I've learned their strengths and weaknesses.

bstalling:
A lot of it is people over-analyzing the information given because they care a lot about the things they read on. Another thing is that people have their favorites and have had big hits through out the years with those particular readers. But you are right, at most you will find an averagely decent reader. Ive found readers that are good at their particular skillset, but never anyone GREAT.

dasaninot:
Yup I agree with you all.
People are emotionally biased. They will be more forgiving if predictions don't happen when the reader has delivered news they want to happen, so they will hang on to hope.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page