Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Storefront Psychics & Online Services

My list of Bitwine/ Kasamba/ Starz Psychics

<< < (4/6) > >>

ladya:

--- Quote from: sawthelight on January 18, 2019, 06:19:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: Sweetsydney2000 on January 18, 2019, 10:25:30 AM ---Ever tried Psychic Ari? I dont usually use Bitwine but she is pretty good at predictions and timing

--- End quote ---

Ari is good..she was right about second POI..ethical too, she didn't even charge me because she was getting so little, just saw things not progressing (saw him being in a deep depression and having tons of baggage, was never able to verify this) but she was right about things flopping with him.

--- End quote ---

Ari is phenom. She always jumps in right away and doesn't waste the 3 minutes and always makes sure she connects before charging. She's one of the most ethical readers I've ever come across. She always says exactly how she sees it, good or bad.

HornetKick:

--- Quote from: sunshineluv7 on January 18, 2019, 06:18:13 PM ---Totally agree - at the end of the day, these are just people like us! And if they're feeling bitter towards men or relationships, they can't help but have personal bias in interpretations. Some readers are doing this more on a "I need to make money today" basis, so that means they won't always be at their very best, just like us when we go to work. The best readings come from clear channels, and the best readers IMO have the luxury of not reading if they know they aren't at their best "state" to be a reader.

Also, super interesting comment about readers potentially seeing their own happenings in the cards. I've never heard that one before.

--- End quote ---
I don’t agree with this at all because at the end of the day, they aren’t just like us. It stumps me when people say this and plus take up for a reader. Readers/Psychics (whatever they call themselves) work to provide insights psychically (which is a key word here) and I and most people I know, don’t do that. Having biases is an effed up way to provide insights. How about just staying neutral and just tell me what you see? In that way I stand less of a chance for your interpretation to be wrong.

And this? [Also, super interesting comment about readers potentially seeing their own happenings in the cards. I've never heard that one before.]
Is just another reason why we may get another effed up reading.

HornetKick:
I realize Ari only has three negative reviews, but I couldn't understand her need to jump on the client and call them names: bitter lying client, delusional.
Ummm no. So uncalled for imo.

sunshineluv7:
Re: Psychics are People Too thoughts - IDK, I've become friends with some of my long-time readers and they definitely all say that. Also that it takes energy to read energy, so some of them don't know how people are online at all hours reading, and what the people I speak to say is that they simply can't be putting that much energy into their readings/going deep.

Just my two cents/experience.

As for ARI - yeah, she's good. So ethical. Has not charged me/told me to come back later or just be patient twice. And def does not go right into charging, she'll use the 3 mins as normal time (on Bitwine's dime). She predicted my guy coming into my life when I didn't even know him yet, and I dislike "future people" readings. (I didn't ask, she threw it in when she was talking about a diff guy, who she said things wouldn't work out with... which she was also right about).

HornetKick:
You’re right, I don’t know the full story so I go by the reviews and especially how the reader handles themselves when the clients do review. If the reader wanted to make it right, whether it was to provide more insight or a refund, or to rage against the client, that is their choice. I would have said she was a bigger person if she replied, god bless or something very neutral.

My response is nothing against you, but since it's my money and it is Bitwine, {I} do get to decide who I read with and can include any tools of judgements or whatever is available to base my selection on. I’ve always based my selection process on reader responses and their profile and have even “based it off a few negative reviews without knowing the full story.” That’s just how I roll.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page