Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > CaliforniaPsychics.com
Tara and Nathan
aquarian_81:
He also mentioned a “legal contract” at the beginning of the reading which doesn’t mean anything to me. He gave me some fairytale story about my POI and made predictions l would see him in person October or November. Very unrealistic given that my POI lives in another country and I haven’t spoke with him in 5 weeks. I also had to give quite abit of information about my situation so not sure if l will use Nathan again. Plus the first 5 mins of his reading did not make sense lol
Chelle9054:
Yup. Nathan mentioned legal contract to me as well. Read with him 3x 2 years ago and nothing. I read with him again recently as he was getting some good reviews and I thought I would try again. His timeframes haven't occurred yet but after reading these posts and how our stories are so similar I am pretty sure they will not.
Allsy2304:
I feel like maybe we should be talking about the present situation that he's getting correctly to see if he's also reading from a script.
First time I called he said he felt like we've talked before. Then he said how POI didn't end things because of distance, he's scared, he's thought about opening a bank account with me, he will propose in Feb/March, he's immature and sometimes I prob thought like a teacher, and theres an ex that came back into the picture.
Allsy2304:
Well they were wrong! POI has a new gf and it is not me haha. Only one who was right (and it felt like she was) was venicepsychic.com
alphabetsoup:
Nathan mentioned a legal contract to me and then the persons initials who's actually involved in a legal contract with me. A Legal situation was the reason I'd called but I only asked him for a general reading. I can't believe he blurted out the persons initials. Now I'm suspecting someone else shared notes with him. :(
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version