Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > Keen.com
Miss Ann - bitwine tarot reader
sawthelight:
well as we all know (lol) no psychic is 100%, however, that person asked about a reader who doesn't sugarcoat outcomes, and IMO, Magicsong doesn't at all. if you read through her FB, you can tell. BUT that doesn't mean she's always right either. None of them are always right, we are lucky if they are 50% right lol.
I just remember asking Magicsong last year if my POI would change if I did xyz, and she was like no, he won't change, he's too set in his ways, and she was 100% right. Also that the relationship wouldn't progress.
Natashanyc:
It wasnt about her being wrong. I didnt like her ethics or her disrespect after i spent money with her. This showed me her character so i would never read with her again. She also gave me a negative outcome similar in that same wording to me and a friend of mine so it made me think she tells everyone the same sht. On top of that the reading was false and the outcome turned out to be positive. So maybe her reading was a lucky guess. She also spends time on forum to get info about ppls life so when she reads for them she fakes like shes accurate. Certain ppl have no value of customers or ethics and i wont spend my money with them.
bstalling:
--- Quote from: Natashanyc on July 06, 2018, 07:40:41 PM ---It wasnt about her being wrong. I didnt like her ethics or her disrespect after i spent money with her. This showed me her character so i would never read with her again. She also gave me a negative outcome similar in that same wording to me and a friend of mine so it made me think she tells everyone the same sht. On top of that the reading was false and the outcome turned out to be positive. So maybe her reading was a lucky guess. She also spends time on forum to get info about ppls life so when she reads for them she fakes like shes accurate. Certain ppl have no value of customers or ethics and i wont spend my money with them.
--- End quote ---
I agree Magicsong is gifted, but not gifted enough and her ethics are poor.
I know her from years back. She used to promote a diet, Kimkins, which was a total fraud. I think they were sued eventually and the owner had to pay restitution. Not about her psychic gifts, but she was willingly misleading people for gain.
Natashanyc:
Yes thats the part of my issue i have with her. Any one who reads u has to have a level of ethics. These are ppl u trust with ur personal life. For her to try to expose my chat just because i gave a review was ridiculous and childish. She was trying to promote that im a liar n lure new clients to try her out. Even the best psychics are wrong sometimes so it was extreme to me to go to a public forum to talk about me to other psychics on the thread. It was deleted by bitwine and she was forced to refund me after i reported the disrespect but i was over it. I will always be honest in my reviews...not mean or nasty but simply honest in saying this prediction passed or not. So many times we look on pages of psychics who have reviews of nonsense like "reader was nice" or "thanks so much" ...no details of whether the person is legit or not. I try to be as helpful as i can to a fellow client
sawthelight:
--- Quote from: Natashanyc on July 06, 2018, 07:40:41 PM ---It wasnt about her being wrong. I didnt like her ethics or her disrespect after i spent money with her. This showed me her character so i would never read with her again. She also gave me a negative outcome similar in that same wording to me and a friend of mine so it made me think she tells everyone the same sht. On top of that the reading was false and the outcome turned out to be positive. So maybe her reading was a lucky guess. She also spends time on forum to get info about ppls life so when she reads for them she fakes like shes accurate. Certain ppl have no value of customers or ethics and i wont spend my money with them.
--- End quote ---
Actually I read with her about a new Poi and she gave me a positive outcome, so I was shocked lol.
Are you still with the guy she was wrong about?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version