Metaphysical, Spiritual and Psychic Discussions > CaliforniaPsychics.com

Only posting positive reviews is crummy, so I do this to even the odds

<< < (3/3)

mignnone:

--- Quote from: journalmuse on April 20, 2018, 07:22:17 PM ---
--- Quote ---
@journalmuse

Would you now after some time has passed recommend reading with Lucians, Nina, Jean or Kelli from CP?

--- End quote ---

I would still read with Nina and Luciana. Probably not the other two. Jean was not correct for me, timeline passed. Kelli, the notes thing still turns me off a bit. However I do think she has a gift. Actually to clarify, I know some will disagree but for me, personally, I don't think taking notes is unethical or bad. I think it makes sense in some ways. What turns me off is that she tried to pass it off like she was just getting dates from spirit and that didn't sit well with me.

--- End quote ---

Besides the note taking, do you think she is accurate like if she sees something it’s going to happen. Is she good with outcomes?

journalmuse:
Unfortunately her timing has been off for me. So not so far, unless it's really really off.

maroonlight:

--- Quote from: journalmuse on September 27, 2017, 09:11:21 PM ---Hey everyone, thanks for all the reviews here, I've been reading through them and posted a little bit and it's been pretty interesting.

I like CP, I have overall had more success with CP readers than Keen, however... one thing I think is really crooked is how they only post positive reviews (their excuse for why is total crap). So what I have started doing to try to give myself a better feel for it is this: I compare how many calls someone has taken, with how many reviews people have left.

My rationale for this is, more people who are generally happier with a reader will mean the reader will in general have more reviews compared to how many calls they've taken. If you have someone who has taken a lot of calls but only has a relatively smaller number of reviews, then that could mean that people were trying to post negative reviews that got deleted or else they were just sorta eh about the call. I figure it's a decent way to judge relatively how satisfied people are with the psychic.

So I have a spreadsheet where I have calculated the number of calls someone has taken with the number of reviews they have, and ranked them. I generally don't include people with less than about 5000-8000 calls because when you have less than that, the numbers are skewed, as the smaller number of calls taken means each review ends up weighted more heavily. (I have found that when people are pretty new, people are more apt to leave reviews and they show up great in my rankings, but the averages start going way down once they take larger numbers of calls.)

This isn't foolproof obviously. Especially when you get a psychic who has like 1-2 people who are addicted to calling them and leave them positive reviews every other day ... but you can usually spot those pretty easily when you start scrolling through the feedback. So anyone whose average is good but I see that there are 1-2 addicts posting constant reviews I usually look at more skeptically. Also, I give men a negative handicap on their average because I think that most clientele of these services are women and, especially given the number that call about broken relationships, I think there could be a tendency for them to inflate their reviews because they think they're attractive or like their voice or whatever. (For good or ill, that's just how I do it). So if you see a man in here, their average is actually depressed lower than what the raw number shows.

That being said, using my rankings with this method, here are the top psychics on CP, in order. I generally don't speak with anyone with a rating lower than these (though there are some exceptions).

pilar
jean
angelica
nina
uli
aliza
gina rose
elizabeth
kelli
natasha
jelena
nathan
justine
samadi
caroline
casey
raziel
callie
elliot
delano
anastasia
nevaeh
danni
brandon
lillian
jesse
jeremiah
tajah
claire
seha
audrey
tenley
bernice
anasela

There are others ranked more highly and also scattered inside this list but I don't include them because they don't have enough calls yet (like 1,000 or something).

Hope you find this helpful...

--- End quote ---

I actually did the exact same things, compared readings and review numbers...never did a damn thing for me. They still all gave me positive outcomes that never happened. I've never read with Gina Rose but I've heard terrible things about her.

LAW1974:
I just found this topic and I wanted to revisit it -- ANyone done anything like this recently?  ANy new updates on these readers?

tellmewhy:
It's only people with no brain who will pay that kind of money for something that's not guaranteed. Unless whatever they are saying is 100%, I won't pay that kind of money. I also understand that if you truly have the gift you can't use it to exploit others.


--- Quote from: LAW1974 on November 30, 2018, 01:12:13 PM ---I just found this topic and I wanted to revisit it -- ANyone done anything like this recently?  ANy new updates on these readers?

--- End quote ---

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page